?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

So, why watch one film about Rome in a weekend when you could watch two? I have been meaning to watch this for like a million years, actually - I don't know why it took me so long.

It's lovely, isn't it? It's a classic story, for both Audrey Hepburn's character and Gregory Peck's. She explores the relationship between duty to others and her own happiness while he weighs up self-interest against love for another; and each achieves personal growth along the way. And I particularly loved the way that the ending didn't attempt to manufacture Disney-style against-the-odds happiness for them. In the press interview at the end, both got to say (in coded language because of the other listeners) what they needed to say to each other. But she had decided that duty to her country mattered more than her own happiness, while he let her know that he respected that, and loved her, and would keep the secret of their day together. It was lovely, and both of them were brilliant - as indeed were Audrey Hepburn's beautiful long swishing 1950s circle skirts!

It is so hugely different from insiders' views of Rome, though. Hepburn and Peck's Rome is a city of charm and delight, full of cafés, dances and tourist spots, and where the only poverty (Peck's) is mild, comic and temporary. What a contrast with, for instance, Ladri di Biciclette (1948), where Rome is a city of unemployment, desperation and squalor, and poverty is real and grinding and inescapable.

I think films about contemporary Rome have always been thus, though; in fact, so have novels and poetry. On the insiders' side, there are films like Roma, Città Aperta (1945), La Dolce Vita (1960), Mamma Roma (1962), and Roma (1972). On the outsiders' (usually American) side, there are films like this one, Three Coins in the Fountain (1954), Only You (1994) and the Olsens' When in Rome. (I'm sure there are loads more in both camps - these are just the ones I'm familiar with).

The insiders' films show the city as conflicting and complex - great yet also terrible. But the outsiders' ones use it mainly as a fairly simple symbol for culture and a device to prompt personal growth - as indeed it has also long served in novels such as Middlemarch (for Dorothea Brooke / Casaubon) and Portrait of a Lady (for Isabel Archer - whose plot arc is actually rather like the princess's in Roman Holiday). The result is that the outsiders' views of Rome are not really about Rome in any very profound way. They are about their characters' personal stories, and those stories could actually be driven in the same way by almost any setting with cultural status and plenty of beautiful and interesting things to do and see.

This doesn't necessarily make them bad stories - it's a valid thing to do with Rome, especially if you are viewing it as an outsider. And amongst the outsiders' films, Roman Holiday really is seminal. It was the first time Rome had really appeared as a tourist destination on the big screen, and the other films I've listed above are very much dependent on it, echoing particular scenes, like the Bocca della Verità scene, which have since become clichés of films of this type. One standard trope is missing, though - Roman Holiday does have a Trevi Fountain scene, but it doesn't include anybody throwing any coins into it. That particular tradition, of course, was brought to the popular consciousness the following year by Three Coins in the Fountain.

I should add that there are of course exceptions to the insiders / outsiders dichotomy I've drawn here, and the major one I know of is Peter Greenaway's Belly of an Architect, which manages to combine the strengths of both traditions. Perhaps that is why, as an outsider myself, it remains very firmly my favourite of all films about the city. But this one is definitely good too, and I'm glad I finally saw it.

Click here to view this entry with minimal formatting.

Comments

( 10 comments — Leave a comment )
altariel
Feb. 7th, 2010 05:56 pm (UTC)
mraltariel, an authority on the romcom, says this one is his favourite. It is gorgeous. She is gorgeous. He is gorgeous. All gorgeous.
strange_complex
Feb. 7th, 2010 06:09 pm (UTC)
Yes, there is certainly much gorgeousness. Do you or he know how unusual it is for romcoms to have a bittersweet duty-over-love ending like this one, though? It strikes me as quite surprising, but then I don't watch that many straightforward romcoms.
altariel
Feb. 7th, 2010 06:29 pm (UTC)
I suspect it's probably not typical for romcoms, but might be fairly typical for the period (not long after the war). I also wonder what the timing is in relation to the Princess Margaret/Peter Townsend romance (which of course has the same duty-over-love ending).

Notting Hill (1999), which is essentially the same story (London replacing Rome), has a happy ending. That's forty years for you!
strange_complex
Feb. 7th, 2010 06:36 pm (UTC)
A quick Google sez that the actual ending of that romance post-dates the film. But a documentary included on the DVD said that the existence of the relationship was part of what the film was drawing on for inspiration nonetheless.
(Deleted comment)
strange_complex
Feb. 7th, 2010 06:14 pm (UTC)
Oh yes, I was most impressed by Roma Città Aperta - I thought it was fantastic. So self-assured and powerful and well put-together, especially given when it was made.

Thanks for the link to the song, too. I think it probably needs appropriate visuals to really bring it out, but it's certainly lovely.
(Deleted comment)
strange_complex
Feb. 7th, 2010 06:37 pm (UTC)
Thanks for the rec - I am always interested in films set in Rome (obviously, given this post!).
myfirstkitchen
Feb. 7th, 2010 06:00 pm (UTC)
One of my favourite films. Another love thwarted job, like most of my faves.
strange_complex
Feb. 7th, 2010 06:19 pm (UTC)
Yes, that ending really made it for me. I was kind of dreading the approach of the end, assuming that it would be all schmaltzy and contrived. But steering clear of that really made the difference between yet another standard love film and a great classic, in my view.
the_lady_lily
Feb. 7th, 2010 07:22 pm (UTC)
I watched this a very long time ago and loved it, although I wasn't thinking in terms of What Rome Does so much - but it's amazing what you see in films once you start looking for it.
strange_complex
Feb. 7th, 2010 08:00 pm (UTC)
Oh, thanks for the link - I enjoyed reading your review. You're dead right to single out Eddie Albert for special mention too - I thought his role was fantastic, and loved it when he presented the princess with his photographs of her day of freedom at the end of the film.
( 10 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

November 2017
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by chasethestars